Is Universal Child Care Universally Beneficial?

With Naomi Schaefer Riley | Ian Rowe | Katharine B. Stevens

PODCAST

Are You Kidding Me? 

May 27, 2020

Nobel laureate James Heckman recently made waves among early childhood advocates when he said he is not, and never was, a supporter of universal pre-K.

In this episode, Katharine Stevens — a resident scholar at AEI specializing in early childhood development — joins Ian and Naomi for a riveting discussion on James Heckman’s research and the case for providing targeted, high-quality care to disadvantaged children over universal pre-K.

Later, Naomi, Ian and Katharine discuss how regulatory burdens could be favoring child care centers over home-based providers during this crisis, and why that is a problem.


Show notes:

0:52 | James Heckman’s recent interview and the economics of human potential
4:00 | Why universal pre-K would not benefit all children
5:20 | The high-intensity, high-quality programs for disadvantaged children
8:20 | Why the optimal early learning environment for most children is their own home
9:30 | The trade-off between parental labor force participation and childhood development
11:20 | Regulatory pressures on home-based child care centers during the pandemic
13:00 | The benefits of home-based child care settings
15:40 | The importance of teaching young children about stable family structure and family formation


CHILDCARE EARLY CHILDHOOD EDUCATION


See Also

Previous
Previous

The Childcare Crisis Is in K-12, Not Early Childhood

Next
Next

Practical Perspectives on “A Roadmap to Reducing Child Poverty”